Roles you gave yourself

Come back tomorrow for a new post!

Read more from the original author:
Queen Usman – Medium

At my cousin’s engagement dinner last year, my aunt spent forty minutes making sure everyone had a seat, a drink, a person to talk to, a compliment they hadn’t asked for. She refilled water glasses before anyone noticed they were empty. When her sister tried to help, she said, gently, that she had it. Nobody had assigned her this. Nobody would have objected if she’d sat down. She has been doing some version of this at every family gathering for as long as I can remember, and at some point, watching her cross the room again with a pitcher she didn’t need to be carrying, I stopped thinking of it as generosity and started wondering what would happen if she simply stopped.

The obvious explanation is that she is a considerate person. This is almost certainly true. It is also not quite sufficient.

Consideration, when it’s occasional, looks like a choice. When it’s constant, it starts to look like something else, a function she performs because the room has come to expect it, and because she has come to expect it of herself, and because the two expectations have merged so completely that neither she nor the room can tell where kindness ends and obligation begins. Nobody assigned her the role. But somewhere along the way, being the person who handles things became indistinguishable from being her.

What makes this hard to examine is that the reward for the behavior is real. She is trusted. She is praised. People are visibly relieved when she’s in the room, because it means less will go wrong. If you removed every incentive, would she still do it? Probably. But that isn’t quite the right question, because by now the incentives and the instinct have been rehearsing together for thirty years, and you cannot easily separate what she wants from what she has been rewarded for wanting.

There’s a version of this that shows up specifically at the moment someone offers relief. Her sister reaches for the pitcher, and she says she has it; fast, before the offer finishes. That speed is worth noticing. It isn’t hospitality. Hospitality can wait a beat. This was something closer to a reflex protecting itself. If you sit down and let someone else pour the water, you are no longer the person who pours the water, and if you have spent three decades being that person, the ordinary chair suddenly asks a question you weren’t prepared for: who are you when nothing needs handling?

I don’t think she’d put it that way. I don’t think most people would. The role rarely announces itself as a role. It just keeps being useful, and usefulness is a comfortable place to stand, because it comes with a job description, and a job description tells you exactly how to be good.

I kept running into a version of this problem while writing Without Permission, though not in the shape I expected. I’d assumed the difficult scene would be the one where Elizabeth finally refuses something, lets a silence sit instead of managing it. I wrote that scene twice and both times it felt false, like a woman performing her own liberation for an audience that wasn’t there. The scene that actually worked was smaller and worse. Elizabeth is alone in her room, no one watching, no one to please, and she straightens a stack of mail that is already straight. She does it out of nothing. There is no room to manage and she does it anyway, because by then the behavior doesn’t need an audience to activate. It has become load-bearing on its own.

That was the part I hadn’t planned for. I had thought the role was something people performed for others and could therefore stop performing once the others left. Writing Elizabeth alone in that room made me realize the role can outlive its original function completely and keep running because stopping feels like a kind of disappearance, not because anyone is still watching.

This is where the easy version of the argument breaks down; the one where you say a person “learned” a behavior and therefore it isn’t really theirs, some costume laid over a truer self underneath. I don’t think that’s what’s happening with my aunt, and I don’t think it’s what happened with Elizabeth. The role didn’t replace a self that was waiting there fully formed. In a lot of cases it became part of the self, genuinely, the way a language you learned late can still become the one you think in. The trouble isn’t that the role is false. The trouble is that it may have gotten too big that a habit which started as one available way of being generous has quietly expanded until it’s the only shape left to occupy, and the person maintaining it has lost track of whether they’re doing it because they want to or because they no longer remember how to be in a room without it.

You can ask, later, whether it was chosen. But the more useful question might be narrower: is there anything left that isn’t the role. Not a rejection of it. Just a check. Something that exists on a night with no dinner to run, no water glasses to notice, nobody left to take care of.

My aunt sat down eventually, that night, after the pitcher was empty and there was nothing left to refill. She looked, for a second, like she didn’t know what to do with her hands.

See you tomorrow with something new!

Cool infos from the sidebar:

-You can share your work in the blog for more people to see it!

-You can join the Discord group to get notified through there or talk to me and other friendly people