"That's just who I am"

Come back tomorrow for a new post!

Read more from the original author:
Queen Usman – Medium

At the airport, her sister goes in for a real hug and gets a shoulder instead, a quick lean-and-pat, over before it starts. “You could just hug me,” her sister says, half-laughing. She says, “I’ve just never been a hugger.”

Nobody argues with that sentence. That’s the interesting part. If she’d said “I don’t want to hug you right now,” her sister might have pushed back, asked why, made it a conversation. But “I’ve just never been a hugger” isn’t about right now. It’s not even really about hugging. It’s a sentence about a person, offered in place of a sentence about an action, and the switch is so smooth that most people don’t notice a request has just been declined without actually being answered.

That’s worth pausing on, because it happens constantly and rarely gets caught: someone asks for ten more minutes, and hears “I need my space.” Someone asks why a text went unanswered for three days, and hears “I’m just bad at texting.” A small, specific, negotiable thing goes in and something permanent and unarguable comes back. You can push on a preference. You can’t really push on a personality. That’s not an accident of phrasing. That’s the whole function of the sentence.

The easy next move here is the one you’d expect: point out that “I’ve just never been a hugger” has a history; a stiff father, an awkward adolescence, a culture that didn’t touch and conclude that the identity is therefore a little bit fake, a scar wearing the costume of a personality. That’s a satisfying twist. It’s also too easy, and probably wrong. Of course it started somewhere. Everything did. Your taste in music started somewhere. Your handwriting started somewhere. “This had a cause” is true of nearly every fact about a person and explains almost nothing about whether the fact is honest. Finding the root of a trait doesn’t disqualify it, it just means the trait has a root, which is the least surprising thing a trait can have.

So the origin isn’t actually the interesting question. The timing is.

Notice when “I’ve just never been a hugger” gets said. Not at breakfast, unprompted. Not to a mirror. It arrives at the exact moment someone asks for more than what’s currently on offer; a longer hug, a longer stay, a returned call, an apology. It shows up under pressure and nowhere else. 

A trait that’s simply true about a person doesn’t need a trigger to be spoken; you’d expect it to surface randomly, the way people mention their allergies or their hometown. This one only surfaces in response to a request. That’s not what self-knowledge usually looks like. It’s what a door closing usually sounds like.

And once you notice that, you start to see what the sentence does in the room, not just what it says about the speaker. It ends the negotiation before it opens. It moves the conversation from can you to I am, and nobody argues with I am; arguing with someone’s account of themselves feels like an accusation, not a request, so the other person backs off, often apologizing for having asked. 

The hugger’s sister will probably feel, faintly, that she was the one being a little much. That’s the transaction underneath the sentence: a small ask goes in, and comes out having quietly become the asker’s fault.

The sentence thought, is very likely also just true. She probably has never been a hugger. Ask her at any calm, unpressured moment and she’ll say the same thing, mean it the same way, and be right. The sentence isn’t a lie recruited to do a job. It’s closer to the opposite problem: it’s a real fact about her that happens to be extremely convenient to reach for exactly when reaching for it is useful. If it weren’t true, it wouldn’t work, her sister can tell the difference between a boundary and a excuse, mostly, and this doesn’t feel like an excuse. It works because it’s sincere.

Which leaves an uncomfortable possibility standing where the tidy conclusion used to be: the honesty and the function aren’t separable. She isn’t choosing, in that moment, between telling the truth about herself and protecting herself from a hug. She’s doing both in the same breath, with the same six words, and there’s no clean seam where one motive ends and the other begins. She probably couldn’t tell you, if you asked her right after, which one she’d just done. Neither could most people, about most of their own “just who I am”s. The self-description and the self-defense arrive fused, and by the time anyone’s looking for the joint, it’s already closed.

None of this requires a dramatic backstory to make sense; no cold father is strictly necessary. Maybe hugging just always felt like performing something she didn’t feel. Maybe nothing happened at all, and it’s simply how she’s wired, the way some people run cold and some run warm. The essay doesn’t need to know, and neither does she. What has a shape isn’t the origin. It’s the moment the sentence gets used, and what it buys the person who says it, a moment her sister will probably never get to ask about again, because the question closed on its own, politely, with an answer that happened to be true.

See you tomorrow with something new!

Cool infos from the sidebar:

-You can share your work in the blog for more people to see it!

-You can join the Discord group to get notified through there or talk to me and other friendly people